HIV/AIDS Skepticism

Pointing to evidence that HIV is not the necessary and sufficient cause of AIDS

Immune stimulation

Posted by Henry Bauer on 2016/11/20

A correspondent sent this message:

Chondroitin sulfate and many other GAGs have been patented from decades to “prevent and cure” HIV. And to serorevert people… Interestingly enough is that Jean Claude Chermann, one of the “discoverers” of HIV, is one of the guys who signed a patent… These facts are pretty well known in the field. And kept well hidden for obvious reasons… Please spread the word and feel free to contact me for any need.

PATENTS:

http://www.google.com/patents/EP0254845A2cl=en http://www.google.si/patents/US4783446 http://www.google.si/patents/US5053398 http://www.google.si/patents/EP0293826A2?cl=en http://www.google.si/patents/US4840941 http://google.com/patents/EP0406512A1cl=en&hl=it http://www.google.ch/patents/WO2007119006A1?cl=en http://www.google.com.ar/patents/WO1989003684A1?cl=en http://www.google.ch/patents/EP0464759A2cl=en

 

I also found some articles in journals about these possibilities

6 Responses to “Immune stimulation”

  1. Lize said

    Hi there Henry. Thanks so much for this. What daily dosage would one be looking at for the Chondroitin sulfate and for how long more or less for seroreverting? Many thanks and look forward to hearing from you.

    • Henry Bauer said

      Lize:
      Sorry, I’m not familiar with the contents of all the patents and published articles. Google “chondroitin immune stimulation” brings some articles as well as the patents, look through them to see whether there are specific recommended dosages for humans. Including “HIV” in the Google search brings articles about inhibition of HIV reverse transcriptase.

  2. Dr. S.L. said

    Dear all,

    please notice that some of these patents clearly state that “the dosage of the sulfates of the above polysaccharide or their salts sufficient to produce blood concentration for anti-virus activity is generally 0.2 – 200 mg/kg, preferably 0.5 – 100 mg/kg. In the case of human, an amount of about 10 mg – 10 g/day, preferably about 50 mg – 5 g/day, is administered in 1 – 4 divisions a day, or as a sustained release form. The administration route can be optional such as oral, rectal, nasal, local (including sublingual), injection (including subcutaneous, intracutaneous, intramuscular and intravenous), inunction etc. The dosage of the mucopolysaccharides or their polysulfate or the salts thereof sufficient to produce a concentration for anti-virus activity is generally 0.2 – 200 mg/kg, preferably 0.5 – 100 mg/kg. In the case of human, an amount of about 10 mg – 20 g/day, preferably about 50 mg ­10 g/day is administered in 1 – 4 divisions a day, or as sustained release form”.

    So these are very low dosages considering that the average amount of chondrotin sulfate used to treat osteoarthritis is much higher:
    (http://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/chondroitin-sulfate/dosing/hrb-20058926)

    Also notice that in the patents it is clearly written that: “Polymerized sugar inhibits the reverse transcriptase of the retrovirus in vitro, and thereby suppresses the replication of the virus. Further, no virus antigen was detected by the indirect immunofluorescence assay in the cells cultured together with these sulfates”.
    I. e. the viral antigens disappear…
    Last but not least, in 1998 it was demonstrated that “chondroitin sulfate reduced viral load to non-detectable level in 10 days” (Posit Health News, 1998 Fall;(No.17):7-1).
    Similar conclusions were reached by an Italian microbiologist. A. di Caro: “Fractions of chemically oversulphated galactosaminoglycan sulphates inhibit three enveloped viruses: human immunodeficiency virus type 1, herpes simplex virus type 1 and human cytomegalovirus” (Antiviral Chemistry & Chemotherapy 10: 33–38).

    Apparently there has been a big interest in keeping these thing hidden from public knowledge. And even more interesting s the fact that the scientists involved in these patents belong to the “orthodoxy”.

    Best regards.

    Sean.

  3. Lukas said

    I had read about this substance in the famous virusmith site,(that means it was well known among the skeptics doctors long before) kremer,lanka,hassig-read last paragraph: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/hkslahprotease.htm

  4. I am trying to understand the significance of this rather cryptic report! Are you saying, perhaps, that these products simply tweak the antibodies detected by an AIDS test, and flip a person from being HIV positive, to negative?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s