HIV/AIDS Skepticism

53c5db81627a583e1bbf Pointing to evidence that HIV is not the necessary and sufficient cause of AIDS

Mainstream magazine prints AIDS Rethinking views

Posted by Henry Bauer on 2013/04/18

The New African magazine, a prominent and respected periodical, has published a critique of two books that hew dogmatically to HIV/AIDS theory: Tinderbox, by Craig Timberg and Daniel Halperin, and The AIDS Conspiracy: Science Fights Back by Nicoli Nattrass.
With matter-of-fact cogency, Charles Geshekter exposes some of the absurdities of the mainstream dogma, like the supposed origin of HIV in a jump from monkey to man and its subsequent spread via innumerable  implausibilities; and the unsustainable mis-calculations about South African deaths where a model’s estimate of ~300,000 is substituted for the South African Statistics count of ~15,000.

Read and enjoy Aids: Anomalies and Contradictions.

About these ads

One Response to “Mainstream magazine prints AIDS Rethinking views”

  1. “It is time to stop”

    That’s the best thing I’ve read about this whole thing for a while. The HIV/AIDS proponents really do need to just bloody well stop. Stop distorting facts. Stop committing the strawman fallacy. Stop parroting falsehoods. Stop being so damned sanctimonious. Stop the ‘science-based medicine’ fervour. Stop believing that calling themselves skeptics makes them magically impervious to being fooled. For humanity’s sake: stop, stop stop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 117 other followers