HIV/AIDS Skepticism

Pointing to evidence that HIV is not the necessary and sufficient cause of AIDS

Doing harm to babies

Posted by Henry Bauer on 2012/04/12

For me, the most harrowing consequence of HIV/AIDS theory is that babies are subjected to lifelong damage by antiretroviral treatments; even if they do not die early from immediate toxic effects of the drugs, they experience irreversible damage to the mitochondria which are the energy centers of all our cells (Hidden in plain sight: The damage done by antiretroviral drugs, 2011/07/25).

Babies are damaged in this way not only if they happen to be HIV-positive: they are subjected to antiretroviral toxins already in utero if their mothers happen to be HIV-positive — despite the evidence that pregnancy itself is likely to stimulate false-positive “HIV” tests (of course, ALL “HIV” positives are false positives, but pregnant women are much more likely than others to test poz — Why pregnant women tend to test “HIV-positive”, 5 October 2009).

The data show quite clearly that “HIV”-poz is more likely, the greater is physiological stress (The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory, in particular Figure 22 and associated tables and discussion). Furthermore, most newborns that test “HIV-poz” revert to negative within a year, in absence of antiretroviral treatment and simply because the mother’s antibodies that make for a poz test have dissipated (The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory, pp. 96-100).

Newborns lack effective immune systems and are safeguarded primarily by antibodies transferred from the mother and by the nutrition and safety from infection provided by breastfeeding. One of the major crimes committed by HIV/AIDS true believers is the advice to mothers, and the moral and legal pressures applied to HIV-poz mothers to avoid breastfeeding — in the face of hosts of studies revealing that exclusively breastfed babies do much better than others, “HIV” notwithstanding (HIV and breastfeeding again, 13 February 2008; More HIV, less infection: The breastfeeding conundrum, 21 November 2007).

David Crowe has just published a detailed, documented discussion of “The AIDS War on Breastfeeding”. Given that this is addressed to a general audience, the essay does not engage in argument about HIV/AIDS theory, it demonstrates that the pressure against breastfeeding is unwarranted and deleterious even on the mainstream’s own terms. This sad story, well into its third decade, illustrates how powerful a “mainstream consensus” is nowadays in the face of clear disproof. The only slightly cheering note is that the official sources are slowly retreating from their mistaken stance. At the same time, Crowe’s citations illustrate how deviously the mainstream tries to avoid admitting its mistakes.

6 Responses to “Doing harm to babies”

  1. Beena said

    “irreversible damage to the mitochondria”
    Irreversible is a strong word.
    Some autistic persons have been found to have impaired mitichondria, and it appears they may be restored to more or less extent by means of antioxidants, glutathione enhancers, etc. So one wonders if the same could apply to these “hiv positive” cases. What’s the evidence of being resolutely un-reversible?

    • Henry Bauer said

      I don’t recall the several sources in which I saw this confirmed, but I heard ti first-hand from a close friend who is a distinguished biochemist, Fellow of the Royal Society and elected for his mitochondria-related work. He also hypothesizes that progressive deterioration of the mitochondria, owing to progressive mutation, is an important element of aging.

      • Beena said

        A close friend who’s an FRS! Perhaps that’s why you don’t name him/her (to save from the incriminating association with your-disreputated-self). Or any chance you could tell me, or at least by email. So I can enquire direct.
        How about the RS introduces a rank of Anti-Fellow (AFRS)? You’d probably be a strong candidate for it (along with myself I’d like to think)!

      • Henry Bauer said

        Yes, there’s no call for him to get associated in any way with “AIDS denialism”. I’ve sent a query.

  2. David Crowe said

    Thanks for starting a discussion here Henry. This is an important discussion. I would say that antivirals are clearly more toxic than formula, but formula can still kill, and does kill many babies. There are many good resources at (an organization I’m also involved with) for people who are interested in this subject in more detail.

  3. What blows my mind is that the vast majority of healthcare providers can’t see that discouraging breastfeeding, especially in Africa, causes an Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Well, I guess it blows my mind that they can’t see that a lifetime supply of chemotherapy causes an Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. I guess a lot of things about the HIV-AIDS hypothesis blow my mind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s