Comments for HIV/AIDS Skepticism

Comment on UPDATE: MORE SPONTANEOUS SEROREVERSION by Henry Bauer

Henry Bauer — Tue, 14 May 2013 14:14:05 +0000

Aut Aut:
A good discussion is by Rodney Richards, Appendix II, “The birth of antibodies equals infection”, in “Serious Adverse Events” by Celia Farber. Melville House, 2006.
There was no reasoning and no observations that led to this, just a colossal mistake that has had terrible consequences.

Comment on UPDATE: MORE SPONTANEOUS SEROREVERSION by Aut Aut

Aut Aut — Tue, 14 May 2013 12:06:40 +0000

reading this blog for a while -very very precious – I often came across to sentences like this: “According to HIV/AIDS dogma, testing “HIV-positive” denotes infection by “HIV” which is permanent and ineradicable”. Well, if I am not wrong, this sentence asserts two things: first, having antibodies ALWAYS means you are CURRENTLY infected (which seems to be true only for the hiv, isnt’ it?) and, secondly, the same infection is ALWAYS permanent and ineradicable,menaing that the same antibodies are pretty useless. Now, I know those are statements which no one in the orthodox side has never proved true, nontheless someone in the early days – maybe Gallo himself -must have given some sort of explanation, some sort of theory for these dogmas! after more than a year of intense reading I haven’t found any yet, .. can anyone help me? thank you a lot

Comment on Breaking News: ‘”Baby Rico rushed to ER, Taken Off Medication,” KAALTV by Harry Stulemeijer

Harry Stulemeijer — Sun, 12 May 2013 16:07:20 +0000

Thank you for your very interesting reply about the books of Ben Goldacre. I have noticed the references in your blogs and I will study them. In the meantime I notified GeneesmiddelenBulletin, a renowned magazine for professionals, about this case, together with some scientific references (Duesberg and Rasnick) and the resurgent debate in Italy. I will return after some time with their reaction.

Comment on Breaking News: ‘”Baby Rico rushed to ER, Taken Off Medication,” KAALTV by Henry Bauer

Henry Bauer — Sun, 12 May 2013 14:40:03 +0000

Harry Stulemeijer: Goldacre illustrates what is true for all of us: it is impossible to have read everything and learned everything, so much of what we believe comes from just believing what others say. Goldacre hasn't looked at the evidence about HIV and AIDS, or a number of other things. Where he has looked at the evidence, as with the drug companies, he draws correct conclusions. I first heard of Goldacre because of a terribly, badly wrong reference he made to Christine Maggiore, and I wrote a blog post with the title "Scientifically illiterate science pundit: Ben Goldacre". Some time later I was asked to review his book, "Bad Science", and was pleasantly surprised that much --- but far from all --- in that book is quite sound, and I wrote a rather even-handed blog about it: "Recognizing REAL pseudo-science — Details, distinctions, and pundit Ben Goldacre". Now I've read "Bad Pharma" and find nothing to disagree with in it --- except perhaps that Goldacre's wish list of what can be done to make things better seems to me quite unrealistic.

Comment on Breaking News: ‘”Baby Rico rushed to ER, Taken Off Medication,” KAALTV by Harry Stulemeijer

Harry Stulemeijer — Sun, 12 May 2013 12:26:15 +0000

That’s right, Henry. Let me tell you. I also happen to be a member of a Special Interest Group of the KNMP, called “Ethics and Philosophy in Pharmacy”, where I advocated that book. But it seems to me, that apparently most members are so busy to assist and advise their patients, that they disregard the threats to the profession at all.
Quasi the whole profession seems to be taken hostage by Big Pharma, politics and the Health Insurance Industry, which instead of insuring just buys the professional service at a take-it-or-leave-it basis. This puts the professional unknowingly in a dependent position. How do one makes the colleagues aware of that, while the bureaucracy of the board is simply ignoring it? It’s absurd. Right now, that SIG is just a joke.
By the way, as an epidemiologist, Ben Goldacre should be aware of the HIV/AIDS-hoax. However, in his book, he takes a different position. Has he already changed his mind?